[OT] All TV is bad?
Puissante
puissante at lrc.puissante.com
Wed Jun 22 06:37:01 EDT 2005
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 12:16, David Bodman wrote:
> I also find that on the Discovery Channel, History Channel, etc. That it's
> very madding when the return from a commercial that the "review" the last
> few bland comments over and over...Bleaach! Com'on, guys, I ain't THAT
> brain-dead!
(Just decided to use Kontact, not bad so far. Getting tired of Evolution, and
Kontact seems to do everything it does anyway...)
What I've noticed is that when a channel like Discovery, Sci Fi, or Science
first comes on line, the programming is not too bad. Then, it's a gradual
descent into mediocrity. With the Science Channel, it only took them a few
months. With the Sci Fi Channel, it took them a couple of years before
getting REAL bad.
Even the History Channel used to be better than what it is today. It used to
be that they had interesting stuff nearly every time I tuned in. Now, it's
all blah with the occasional exception.
Is there some sort of "dumbbing down field" that kicks into effect once a new
channel goes on line? Or is it that they subcome to the usual "market to the
masses for ad dollars" forces?
-Fred
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list