SEOs -- what's the prevailing attitude?
Martin Ekendahl
mekendahl at hardlined.com
Wed Sep 7 09:47:00 EDT 2005
Hi Everyone
First time poster, short time lurker. Thought I'd introduce myself first.
I've done some research on increasing search engine hits strictly from a
google view point.
Here are a few things I've come across.
- Meta tags are largely ignored.
- The page title plays a large role in ranking.
- Frequency of keywords in *context* throughout the page and site have
replaced the meta keywords tag.
- Proper well syntaxes html is also a plus.
- As for google page ranking, the more links to your your page, the more
relevant it is deemed, this of course increases page hits.
- Frequent updates will cause the page to be crawled more often,
although I have yet to determine if this actually changes the page ranking.
I'm sure there are other factors I haven't come across yet, but these
seem to be most of the basic ones.
Thanks for listening :-)
-Martin
Cole Tuininga wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:29 -0400, Brian Chabot wrote:
>
>>There are proper ways to optimize for search engines: meta tags, good
>>content, original work, frequent and meaningful updates...
>>
>>There are also bad ways: blogspamming, keyword loading (white on white
>>or black on black text...), useless web pages that exist solely for
>>spiders, etc.
>
>
>
> My understanding is that search engines largely ignore meta tags these
> days. Also, the whole white on white or black on black text idea
> actually *hurts* your ranking rather than helps it.
>
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list