Samba PDC/BDC
Ben Scott
dragonhawk at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 20:53:01 EST 2006
On 1/17/06, Paul Lussier <p.lussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> Have every samba server be the PDC for local, and the BDC for the
> remote domains.
Ahhh, okay. Yah, that makes sense.
> And yes, this would require seperate instances of
> Samba running on the same machine.
I believe you also need to bind them each to separate IP addresses,
due to the way the NTLM protocol works (or fails to, rather). Still,
this is a lot better then Microsoft, which requires you to have one
server per domain! Still! Ick!
-- Ben "Microsoft is macro-hard" Scott
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list