Samba PDC/BDC

Ben Scott dragonhawk at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 20:53:01 EST 2006


On 1/17/06, Paul Lussier <p.lussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> Have every samba server be the PDC for local, and the BDC for the
> remote domains.

  Ahhh, okay.  Yah, that makes sense.

> And yes, this would require seperate instances of
> Samba running on the same machine.

  I believe you also need to bind them each to separate IP addresses,
due to the way the NTLM protocol works (or fails to, rather).  Still,
this is a lot better then Microsoft, which requires you to have one
server per domain!  Still!  Ick!

-- Ben "Microsoft is macro-hard" Scott



More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list