Free kernel memory

Ben Scott dragonhawk at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 14:18:00 EDT 2006


On 6/2/06, klussier at comcast.net <klussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> I guess they want to make sure that the kernel is efficient in it's memory handling,
> and by flushing the cache, they can control the memory usage?

  I don't even think that much is right.  Any time the kernel does
I/O, it uses buffers.  Even if you can find some way to cause the
kernel to "free" them all, it will immediately need to allocate new
ones for every I/O operation it does after that.  And it will cache
those all over again, too.

On 6/2/06, Paul Lussier <p.lussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> Isn't this what profilers are for?

  Isn't debugging what engineers are for?  ;-)

-- Ben



More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list