Free kernel memory
Ben Scott
dragonhawk at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 14:18:00 EDT 2006
On 6/2/06, klussier at comcast.net <klussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> I guess they want to make sure that the kernel is efficient in it's memory handling,
> and by flushing the cache, they can control the memory usage?
I don't even think that much is right. Any time the kernel does
I/O, it uses buffers. Even if you can find some way to cause the
kernel to "free" them all, it will immediately need to allocate new
ones for every I/O operation it does after that. And it will cache
those all over again, too.
On 6/2/06, Paul Lussier <p.lussier at comcast.net> wrote:
> Isn't this what profilers are for?
Isn't debugging what engineers are for? ;-)
-- Ben
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list