The final solution

[Paul Lussier]

"Ben Scott" <dragonhawk at gmail.com> writes:

> On 10/18/06, Paul Lussier <p.lussier at comcast.net> wrote:
>> Dealing with consoles, xterms, and Xauthority
>> are highly encouraged, but not required.
>
>   You should get X resources in there, too.

Well, if an implementor chose to be X compliant, one of the config
files they could opt to use are any of the several X config files,
/etc/X11/Xresource, ~/.Xdefaults, etc.

>> P.S. This mail is X-Visually-Appealing-And-Easy-To-Sort-On header compliant.
>
>   You put the list-of-identifying-characteristics-by-which-alt-contact-can-be-recognized
> field in the wrong position.

Doh!  I wrote the spec before I added the header, then changed the
spec, but evidently somewhat incompletely :(

Of course, at least I *tried* to conform to the spec.  I noticed you
didn't even make an attempt.  Future infractions will not be tolerated! ;)

Here's the new spec:

X-Visually-Appealing-And-Easy-To-Sort-On: \
  [ <date-when-the-mail-is-being-sent> ] \
  [ <date-by-which-the-mail-should-arrive> ] \
  [ <senders-address> ] \
  [ <senders-public-gpg-key> ] \
  [ <senders-social-security-number> ] \
  [ <senders-home-phone-number> ] \
  [ <list-of-identifying-characteristics-by-which-sender-can-be-recognized> ] \
  [ <alternate-contact-in-case-we-cannot-reach-sender> ] \
  [ <alternate-contact-home-phone-number> ] \
  [ <list-of-identifying-characteristics-by-which-alt-contact-can-be-recognized> ] \
  [ <subject-category-or-relevance-of-mail-to-the-list> ] \
  [ <mailing-list-name AT-Sigil mailing-list-hosting-domain-name> ]

Please note that this mail is compliant to this version of the
X-Visually-Appealing-And-Easy-To-Sort-On specification.
-- 
Seeya,
Paul