Why we can't record our TV shows

Paul Lussier p.lussier at comcast.net
Mon Mar 26 13:08:11 EDT 2007


Travis Roy <travis at scootz.net> writes:

>> I'm curious...is there a model in which you'd consider paying for
>> content?  The model could have reasonable prices and fair/non-existent
>> copy-protection or whatever else you'd like.
>
> If it's stuff that I can get OTA with an antenna (If I didn't live in
> the sticks), then no, I wouldn't pay for it. I'd setup myth to record
> it and auto strip the commercials.  So for me there's no difference
> between this and downloading the torrent.

Except that by partaking in a Bit-Torrent cloud you are unethically
and illegally re-distributing the content which violates copyright,
and is something that does not fall under "fair-use".  Therefore,
there is a difference (legally-speaking) with respect to bit-torrent
and MythTV.

In the latter case, you are in fact time-shifting an OTA broadcast
show which falls under the fair-use doctrine.  In the former you
violate the content owner's exclusive right to control distribution.

I'm not saying I agree with this, just pointing out the differences :)

-- 
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE

A: Yes.                                                               
> Q: Are you sure?                                                    
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.           
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?


More information about the gnhlug-discuss mailing list