WAP/Router for use with OpenVPN
Drew Van Zandt
drew.vanzandt at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 12:16:18 EDT 2009
Doing OpenVPN over TCP is, in my experience, human-noticeably slow in
comparison to UDP; I have seen no issues with multiple machines behind the
same NAT.
--DTVZ
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Charron <twaffle at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Drew Van Zandt<drew.vanzandt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It *is* really easy. No idea what multiple people using it has to do
> with
> > anything, as I forward only one UDP port through my router and have many
> > people connected to my VPN. Even the initial config is easy enough for
> > nontechnical friends to handle, now that I've written up simple
> directions.
> > Once it's set up, they don't have to do *anything*, every time they boot
> > they're on the VPN and have samba shares mapped on their Windows boxes.
> On
> > rare occasion they might have to retype their share passwords.
>
> I had tried it initially, and in my case, had two systems which
> where behind a NAT, VPNing into the system which was behind a
> firewall, and bad things happened. The UDP packets are mapped by
> to<=>from IP, and when multiple people are using it with the same one,
> it got all sorts of confused.
>
> Of course, that was three years ago. Perhaps they fixed the issue
> since then. *shrug* I like using it over TCP personally.
>
> --
> -- Thomas
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20090707/cd0f26d5/attachment.html
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list