Novell agrees to be acquired by Attachmate.
Joshua Judson Rosen
rozzin at geekspace.com
Wed Nov 24 21:49:15 EST 2010
Benjamin Scott <dragonhawk at gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Kevin D. Clark
> <kevin_d_clark at comcast.net> wrote:
> > > I barely trust people to drive in two dimensions, let alone three!
> >
> > My commute takes me a little while, so I have to drive in four.
>
> You may travel in four, but your direction and rate of movement
> along one dimension is fixed. You're not driving for that; you're
> just along for the ride. And you have limited influence over another
> dimension. So *driving*, it is more like 2.5 dimensions. Like the
> original Doom! No respawn or save games, though. Bummer.
Yeah, jeez--I recently took a 4k-mile road-trip with my family,
and about .7k miles in..., someone slammed into my (parked) car.
I really wished I'd had some sort of revision-control, there--
it would have been great to just revert that whole `parking' series
and re-do it with my car parked one more space to the right.
Though, to be fair..., one *does* at least get some amount of control
over *how fast* one moves forward through time (e.g.: the pot
of coffee that I just brewed for my wife...).
Coincidentally, I just caught the last half-hour of `The Exchange'
on NHPR, where Laura Knoy was doing a call-in+interview with
Howard Mansfield about his book... on time:
http://www.nhpr.org/howard-mansfield-time-and-place
There were, at least, a few interesting remarks from Mansfield
in the last few minutes--something about the Amish having
chosen to maintain control over `the clock' and choosing
which technologies to accept or reject as a means to that end.
I'm considering becoming techno-Amish (keeping my computers...
and my flying car...).
--
"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))."
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list