Best RAW photo editing tool?

[Joshua Judson Rosen]

Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> writes:
>
> Fotoxx, which is my preferred tool for JPEG photo edits, now handles
> RAW file natively, no longer by just shelling out to
> ufraw&dcraw. Caveat, since Mike avoids integer math overflow pixel
> problems by using FLOATs, so don't expect snappy performance on a
> limited machine with large RAWs !

Hrm. Is that actually an appropriate use of floats? I imagine
people working with JPEGs as source material basically can't care
about whatever precision is being lost; is the lost precision
`down in the noise' for RAW, too?

-- 
"'tis an ill wind that blows no minds."