Hello. Is anyone there?
bscott at ntisys.com
bscott at ntisys.com
Tue Jul 8 12:55:54 EDT 2003
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, at 12:38pm, ben at blackavar.com wrote:
> Personally, I think that's a bad way to look at it. Spam is our problem
> and if we were vulnerable to either unauthenticated proxying or SMTP
> relaying, then it's -OUR- problem.
That is a completely different situation. Spam is a problem. But we were
not talking about spam; we were talking about being present on somebody's
list of something-or-other. There is a subtle but important difference
there.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, at 12:33pm, ben at blackavar.com wrote:
> Apparently, it thinks rogue.codemeta.com is an open proxy.
AFAIK, they are wrong (see below). If someone can demonstrate that rogue
is an open proxy, then I will immediately move to get that fixed, since that
*is* our problem. But the fact that they are wrong is not our problem.
| $ telnet rogue.codemeta.com 80
| Trying 199.125.75.14...
| Connected to rogue.codemeta.com (199.125.75.14).
| Escape character is '^]'.
< CONNECT mail.ntisys.com:25 HTTP/1.0
<
> HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed
> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:52:52 GMT
--
Ben Scott <bscott at ntisys.com>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind. |
More information about the gnhlug-discuss
mailing list