embedded devices and open source

[Tom Buskey]

On 2/23/07, Python <python at venix.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 13:02 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
> > Personally, I've done work for embedded
> > systems that can run Open Source software.  The support nightmare for
> > people who screw with the devices, then 'put back' the stock version
> > of the software would be a nightmare, and would generally cause me to


And the warranty is then voided.  Just like when you peel off the tickers
over the access screws.

I have enjoyed using the Linksys Linux routers because of the
> flexibility and network smarts that can be obtained from a relatively
> inexpensive piece of hardware.
>
> Is the manufacturer's perspective really that grim when trying to
> support an open source device?  I would think the manufacturer of a
> Linux/GNU device has an edge.  The manufacturer  simply has to implement
> the base features of the competition.  By enabling others to build
> additional modules and customizations the hardware becomes more useful
> without much additional effort.
>
> Am I way off base?


I have 2 Linksys wrt54g routers myself and have recommended them to others
because of the OS that I can modify after the warranty has expired/been
voided.  In fact, the L version exists only to satisfy customers that want
the Linux version and will pay more for it.  I wonder what the ratio of L to
non-L sales is.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/private/gnhlug-discuss/attachments/20070223/d575bd26/attachment.html